2014-10-01 17:42:18 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2014 The WebRTC project authors. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
|
|
|
|
|
* that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
|
|
|
|
|
* tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
|
|
|
|
|
* in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
|
|
|
|
|
* be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-28 18:17:40 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "webrtc/system_wrappers/include/aligned_array.h"
|
2014-10-01 17:42:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool IsAligned(const void* ptr, int alignment) {
|
|
|
|
|
return reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(ptr) % alignment == 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace webrtc {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(AlignedArrayTest, CheckAlignment) {
|
|
|
|
|
AlignedArray<bool> arr(10, 7, 128);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(IsAligned(arr.Array(), 128));
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(IsAligned(arr.Row(i), 128));
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(arr.Row(i), arr.Array()[i]);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(AlignedArrayTest, CheckOverlap) {
|
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce
use of int16_t/uint16_t.
This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects.
This was be reviewed and approved in pieces:
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002
The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above.
BUG=chromium:81439
TEST=none
R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org
TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
|
|
|
AlignedArray<size_t> arr(10, 7, 128);
|
2014-10-01 17:42:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
|
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce
use of int16_t/uint16_t.
This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects.
This was be reviewed and approved in pieces:
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002
The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above.
BUG=chromium:81439
TEST=none
R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org
TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
|
|
|
for (size_t j = 0; j < 7; ++j) {
|
2014-10-01 17:42:18 +00:00
|
|
|
arr.At(i, j) = 20 * i + j;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
|
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce
use of int16_t/uint16_t.
This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects.
This was be reviewed and approved in pieces:
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002
The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above.
BUG=chromium:81439
TEST=none
R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org
TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
|
|
|
for (size_t j = 0; j < 7; ++j) {
|
2014-10-01 17:42:18 +00:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(arr.At(i, j), 20 * i + j);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(arr.Row(i)[j], 20 * i + j);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(arr.Array()[i][j], 20 * i + j);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-20 20:10:57 +02:00
|
|
|
TEST(AlignedArrayTest, CheckRowsCols) {
|
|
|
|
|
AlignedArray<bool> arr(10, 7, 128);
|
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(arr.rows(), 10);
|
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce
use of int16_t/uint16_t.
This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects.
This was be reviewed and approved in pieces:
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002
https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002
The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above.
BUG=chromium:81439
TEST=none
R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org
TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(arr.cols(), 7u);
|
2015-06-20 20:10:57 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-10-01 17:42:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-20 20:10:57 +02:00
|
|
|
} // namespace webrtc
|