webrtc_m130/webrtc/system_wrappers/source/aligned_array_unittest.cc

61 lines
1.5 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2014 The WebRTC project authors. All Rights Reserved.
*
* Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
* that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
* tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
* in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
* be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
*/
#include "webrtc/system_wrappers/include/aligned_array.h"
#include <stdint.h>
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
namespace {
bool IsAligned(const void* ptr, int alignment) {
return reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(ptr) % alignment == 0;
}
} // namespace
namespace webrtc {
TEST(AlignedArrayTest, CheckAlignment) {
AlignedArray<bool> arr(10, 7, 128);
ASSERT_TRUE(IsAligned(arr.Array(), 128));
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
ASSERT_TRUE(IsAligned(arr.Row(i), 128));
ASSERT_EQ(arr.Row(i), arr.Array()[i]);
}
}
TEST(AlignedArrayTest, CheckOverlap) {
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce use of int16_t/uint16_t. This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects. This was be reviewed and approved in pieces: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002 The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above. BUG=chromium:81439 TEST=none R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
AlignedArray<size_t> arr(10, 7, 128);
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce use of int16_t/uint16_t. This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects. This was be reviewed and approved in pieces: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002 The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above. BUG=chromium:81439 TEST=none R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
for (size_t j = 0; j < 7; ++j) {
arr.At(i, j) = 20 * i + j;
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce use of int16_t/uint16_t. This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects. This was be reviewed and approved in pieces: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002 The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above. BUG=chromium:81439 TEST=none R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
for (size_t j = 0; j < 7; ++j) {
ASSERT_EQ(arr.At(i, j), 20 * i + j);
ASSERT_EQ(arr.Row(i)[j], 20 * i + j);
ASSERT_EQ(arr.Array()[i][j], 20 * i + j);
}
}
}
TEST(AlignedArrayTest, CheckRowsCols) {
AlignedArray<bool> arr(10, 7, 128);
ASSERT_EQ(arr.rows(), 10);
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce use of int16_t/uint16_t. This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects. This was be reviewed and approved in pieces: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002 The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above. BUG=chromium:81439 TEST=none R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
ASSERT_EQ(arr.cols(), 7u);
}
} // namespace webrtc