Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

82 lines
3.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2011 The WebRTC project authors. All Rights Reserved.
*
* Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
* that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
* tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
* in the file PATENTS. All contributing project authors may
* be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
*/
/******************************************************************
iLBC Speech Coder ANSI-C Source Code
WebRtcIlbcfix_CbMemEnergy.c
******************************************************************/
#include "modules/audio_coding/codecs/ilbc/cb_mem_energy.h"
#include "modules/audio_coding/codecs/ilbc/cb_mem_energy_calc.h"
#include "modules/audio_coding/codecs/ilbc/constants.h"
#include "modules/audio_coding/codecs/ilbc/defines.h"
/*----------------------------------------------------------------*
* Function WebRtcIlbcfix_CbMemEnergy computes the energy of all
* the vectors in the codebook memory that will be used in the
* following search for the best match.
*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
void WebRtcIlbcfix_CbMemEnergy(
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce use of int16_t/uint16_t. This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects. This was be reviewed and approved in pieces: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002 The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above. BUG=chromium:81439 TEST=none R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
size_t range,
int16_t *CB, /* (i) The CB memory (1:st section) */
int16_t *filteredCB, /* (i) The filtered CB memory (2:nd section) */
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce use of int16_t/uint16_t. This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects. This was be reviewed and approved in pieces: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002 The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above. BUG=chromium:81439 TEST=none R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
size_t lMem, /* (i) Length of the CB memory */
size_t lTarget, /* (i) Length of the target vector */
int16_t *energyW16, /* (o) Energy in the CB vectors */
int16_t *energyShifts, /* (o) Shift value of the energy */
int scale, /* (i) The scaling of all energy values */
Update a ton of audio code to use size_t more correctly and in general reduce use of int16_t/uint16_t. This is the upshot of a recommendation by henrik.lundin and kwiberg on an original small change ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/42569004/#ps1 ) to stop using int16_t just because values could fit in it, and is similar in nature to a previous "mass change to use size_t more" ( https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/23129004/ ) which also needed to be split up for review but to land all at once, since, like adding "const", such changes tend to cause a lot of transitive effects. This was be reviewed and approved in pieces: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224093003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224123002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1224163002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225133003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1225173002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227163003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227203003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227213002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1227893002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228793004 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228803003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228823003 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1228843002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230693002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1231713002 The change is being landed as TBR to all the folks who reviewed the above. BUG=chromium:81439 TEST=none R=andrew@webrtc.org, pbos@webrtc.org TBR=aluebs, andrew, asapersson, henrika, hlundin, jan.skoglund, kwiberg, minyue, pbos, pthatcher Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1230503003 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9768}
2015-08-24 14:52:23 -07:00
size_t base_size /* (i) Index to where energy values should be stored */
) {
int16_t *ppi, *ppo, *pp;
int32_t energy, tmp32;
/* Compute the energy and store it in a vector. Also the
* corresponding shift values are stored. The energy values
* are reused in all three stages. */
/* Calculate the energy in the first block of 'lTarget' sampels. */
ppi = CB+lMem-lTarget-1;
ppo = CB+lMem-1;
pp=CB+lMem-lTarget;
energy = WebRtcSpl_DotProductWithScale( pp, pp, lTarget, scale);
/* Normalize the energy and store the number of shifts */
energyShifts[0] = (int16_t)WebRtcSpl_NormW32(energy);
tmp32 = energy << energyShifts[0];
energyW16[0] = (int16_t)(tmp32 >> 16);
/* Compute the energy of the rest of the cb memory
* by step wise adding and subtracting the next
* sample and the last sample respectively. */
WebRtcIlbcfix_CbMemEnergyCalc(energy, range, ppi, ppo, energyW16, energyShifts, scale, 0);
/* Next, precompute the energy values for the filtered cb section */
energy=0;
pp=filteredCB+lMem-lTarget;
energy = WebRtcSpl_DotProductWithScale( pp, pp, lTarget, scale);
/* Normalize the energy and store the number of shifts */
energyShifts[base_size] = (int16_t)WebRtcSpl_NormW32(energy);
tmp32 = energy << energyShifts[base_size];
energyW16[base_size] = (int16_t)(tmp32 >> 16);
ppi = filteredCB + lMem - 1 - lTarget;
ppo = filteredCB + lMem - 1;
WebRtcIlbcfix_CbMemEnergyCalc(energy, range, ppi, ppo, energyW16, energyShifts, scale, base_size);
}