Reason for revert:
It turns out this revert was not necessary because the connection-state mapping for turn-turn connections was not done in connection.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Revert "Revert of Update the BWE when the network route changes. (patchset #5 id:180001 of https://… (patchset #5 id:120001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2041593002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> ReadyToSendMedia did not consider the new presumed_writable state.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Revert "Revert of Update the BWE when the network route changes. (patchset #5 id:180001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2000063003/ )"
> >
> > This reverts commit 72d41aa6da94dacb8a8464d1abd4ca7d1afffc65.
> >
> > New change made:
> > Do not reset the BWE when the new network route is not ready to send media.
> >
> > BUG=
> > R=pthatcher@webrtc.org, stefan@webrtc.org
> >
TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org,stefan@webrtc.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2094863003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13282}
Reason for revert:
ReadyToSendMedia did not consider the new presumed_writable state.
Original issue's description:
> Revert "Revert of Update the BWE when the network route changes. (patchset #5 id:180001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2000063003/ )"
>
> This reverts commit 72d41aa6da94dacb8a8464d1abd4ca7d1afffc65.
>
> New change made:
> Do not reset the BWE when the new network route is not ready to send media.
>
> BUG=
> R=pthatcher@webrtc.org, stefan@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/5b5d2cdad7018993272525a723ef34f7da5c45f2
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13280}
TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org,stefan@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2098703004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13281}
This reverts commit e30c27205148b34ba421184efe65f6a0780b436d (https://codereview.webrtc.org/1958053002/)
Original reverted cl is in patch set #1.
Changes in following patch sets.
The cl now also make sure SendPacer starts with the configured bitrate provided in a call to CongestionController::SetBweBitrates)()
It turns out that the failing tests in 609816 is due to a bug in the current code that runs the proper at 300kbit regardless of configured start bitrate.
Original cl description:
Remove SendPacer from ViEEncoder
This CL moves the logic where the ViEEncoder pause if the pacer is full to the BitrateController. If the queue is full, the controller reports a bitrate of zero to Call (and BitrateAllocator)
BUG=chromium:609816, webrtc:5687
TBR=mflodman@webrtc.org
NOTRY=True // Due to bug in android_x86 cq builder....
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1958113003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12688}
This reverts commit 825eb58d59940a4c3c9837595c4b3b07059c93ca.
This Relands the cl reviewed in https://codereview.webrtc.org/1917793002/
patchset #1 is a pure reland.
patchset #2 fix an overflow in BitrateProber that caused WebRtcVideoChannel2BaseTest.TwoStreamsSendAndReceive to fail.
Original cl description:
Remove SendPacer from ViEEncoder
This CL moves the logic where the ViEEncoder pause if the pacer is full to the BitrateController. If the queue is full, the controller reports a bitrate of zero to Call (and BitrateAllocator)
R=stefan@webrtc.orgTBR=mflodman@webrtc.org
BUG=webrtc:5687
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1947873002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12630}
This CL moves the logic where the ViEEncoder pause if the pacer is full to the BitrateController. If the queue is full, the controller reports a bitrate of zero to Call (and BitrateAllocator)
BUG=webrtc:5687
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1917793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12620}
Reason for revert:
Revert breaks other uses, a fix will be rolled into Chromium instead.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Remove ignored return code from modules. (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/1703833002/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> Breaks Chromium.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Remove ignored return code from modules.
> >
> > ModuleProcessImpl doesn't act on return codes and having them around is
> > confusing (it's unclear what an error return code here would do even).
> >
> > BUG=
> > R=tommi@webrtc.org
> >
> > Committed: f14c47a58c
>
> TBR=tommi@webrtc.org,pbos@webrtc.org
> # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/da33a8a2a22f6d19ba2a8cce963beafbdbaa8fd8
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11761}
TBR=tommi@webrtc.org,torbjorng@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1737013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11762}
Reason for revert:
Breaks Chromium.
Original issue's description:
> Remove ignored return code from modules.
>
> ModuleProcessImpl doesn't act on return codes and having them around is
> confusing (it's unclear what an error return code here would do even).
>
> BUG=
> R=tommi@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: f14c47a58cTBR=tommi@webrtc.org,pbos@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1736663004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11761}
ModuleProcessImpl doesn't act on return codes and having them around is
confusing (it's unclear what an error return code here would do even).
BUG=
R=tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1703833002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#11747}
