When the flag prune_turn_ports is set, When a high-priority turn port becomes available, it will prune low-priority ones. The pruned port will not be used for creating connections locally and its candidates will not be sent over to the remove side (unless they have been sent before being pruned).
This effectively reduces the number of TURN candidates and connections created by TURN ports.
BUG=
R=deadbeef@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2093623004 .
Committed: https://crrev.com/17aac053f585e892114974d2eb248e05ad37f973
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13335}
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13354}
Reason for revert:
Breaks Win32/Win64 Debug bots in client.webrtc waterfall
Original issue's description:
> Add config to prune low-priority TURN ports for creating connections
> When the flag prune_turn_ports is set, When a high-priority turn port becomes available, it will prune low-priority ones. The pruned port will not be used for creating connections locally and its candidates will not be sent over to the remove side (unless they have been sent before being pruned).
>
> This effectively reduces the number of TURN candidates and connections created by TURN ports.
>
> BUG=
> R=deadbeef@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/17aac053f585e892114974d2eb248e05ad37f973
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13335}
TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org,deadbeef@webrtc.org,honghaiz@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2111663003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13342}
When the flag prune_turn_ports is set, When a high-priority turn port becomes available, it will prune low-priority ones. The pruned port will not be used for creating connections locally and its candidates will not be sent over to the remove side (unless they have been sent before being pruned).
This effectively reduces the number of TURN candidates and connections created by TURN ports.
BUG=
R=deadbeef@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2093623004 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13335}
According to JSEP, the candidate filter does not affect pooled
candidates because they can be filtered once they're ready to be
surfaced to the application.
So, pooled port allocator sessions will use a filter of CF_ALL, with a
new filter applied when the session is taken by a P2PTransportChannel.
When the filter is applied:
* Some candidates may no longer be returned by ReadyCandidates()
* Some candidates may no longer have a "related address" (for privacy)
* Some ports may no longer be returned by ReadyPorts()
To simplify this, the candidate filtering logic is now moved up from
the Ports to the BasicPortAllocator, with some helper methods to perform
the filtering and stripping out of data.
R=honghaiz@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1998813002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12856}
Depends on this CL in order to work in Chromium:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1976673002/
It works by creating pooled PortAllocatorSessions which can be picked up
by a P2PTransportChannel when needed (after a local description is set).
This can optimize candidate gathering time when there is some time between
creating a PeerConnection and setting a local description.
R=pthatcher@webrtc.org
Committed: 48e9d05f51
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1956453003 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12729}
Reason for revert:
Breaks remoting_unittests. They defined their own operator== which conflicts with this one.
I'll remove the operator== in a roll CL. But until it's approved, I'm reverting this so the FYI bots will pass.
Original issue's description:
> Implement RTCConfiguration.iceCandidatePoolSize.
>
> It works by creating pooled PortAllocatorSessions which can be picked up
> by a P2PTransportChannel when needed (after a local description is set).
>
> This can optimize candidate gathering time when there is some time between
> creating a PeerConnection and setting a local description.
>
> R=pthatcher@webrtc.org
>
> Committed: 48e9d05f51TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org,honghaiz@webrtc.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1972043004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12709}
It works by creating pooled PortAllocatorSessions which can be picked up
by a P2PTransportChannel when needed (after a local description is set).
This can optimize candidate gathering time when there is some time between
creating a PeerConnection and setting a local description.
R=pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1956453003 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12708}
Reason for revert:
This CL just landed: https://codereview.chromium.org/1323243006/
Which fixes the FYI bots for the original CL, and breaks them for this revert.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of TransportController refactoring. (patchset #6 id:100001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/1350523003/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> This CL causes problems with the WebRTC-in-Chromium FYI bots. Presumably it needs to be done in several steps, where removed files are emptied instead of removed in the first step.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > TransportController refactoring.
> >
> > Getting rid of TransportProxy, and in its place adding a
> > TransportController class which will facilitate access to and manage
> > the lifetimes of Transports. These Transports will now be accessed
> > solely from the worker thread, simplifying their implementation.
> >
> > This refactoring also pulls Transport-related code out of BaseSession.
> > Which means that BaseChannels will now rely on the TransportController
> > interface to create channels, rather than BaseSession.
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/47ee2f3b9f33e8938948c482c921d4e13a3acd83
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10022}
>
> TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org,deadbeef@webrtc.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a81a42f584baa0d93a4b93da9632415e8922450c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10024}
TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org,torbjorng@webrtc.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1361773005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10036}
Reason for revert:
This CL causes problems with the WebRTC-in-Chromium FYI bots. Presumably it needs to be done in several steps, where removed files are emptied instead of removed in the first step.
Original issue's description:
> TransportController refactoring.
>
> Getting rid of TransportProxy, and in its place adding a
> TransportController class which will facilitate access to and manage
> the lifetimes of Transports. These Transports will now be accessed
> solely from the worker thread, simplifying their implementation.
>
> This refactoring also pulls Transport-related code out of BaseSession.
> Which means that BaseChannels will now rely on the TransportController
> interface to create channels, rather than BaseSession.
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/47ee2f3b9f33e8938948c482c921d4e13a3acd83
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10022}
TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org,deadbeef@webrtc.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1358413003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10024}
Getting rid of TransportProxy, and in its place adding a
TransportController class which will facilitate access to and manage
the lifetimes of Transports. These Transports will now be accessed
solely from the worker thread, simplifying their implementation.
This refactoring also pulls Transport-related code out of BaseSession.
Which means that BaseChannels will now rely on the TransportController
interface to create channels, rather than BaseSession.
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1350523003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#10022}
Accept incoming pings before remote answer is set, to reduce connection latency.
Set ICE connection state to 'checking' after setting the remote answer, so that it can transition into 'connected' if the peer reflexive connection is up before any remote candidate is set. See more details in crbug/446908
BUG=4068, crbug/446908
R=juberti@webrtc.org, pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/38709004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8141 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
This reverts r7980.
It was causing the ICE connected state to happen while still in the new state rather than going through the checking state, which was causing an ASSERT to fire, which was causing a crash.
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/41429004
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8031 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
