Reporting the duplicate TSNs is a SHOULD in the RFC, and using the
duplicate TNSs is a MAY, and in reality I haven't seen an implementation
use it yet. However, it's good for debugging and for stats generation.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: I1cc3f86961a8d289708cbf50d98dedfd25077955
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/219462
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34053}
This should avoid the situation where WebRTC's GN check is green and
Chromium (which turns it ON for //third_party/webrtc) fails.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: Id4c06ac57e9faa07c5e43491a61fbc093c68a40d
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/217221
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33900}
Those were found when trying to build within Chromium's codebase.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: Ic3f7a266ad4b5d816a693645e1e909fc39d513c3
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/217220
Reviewed-by: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Florent Castelli <orphis@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33896}
These are some fixes that were added after submission of
https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/213664
Mainly:
* Don't accept TSNs that have a too large difference from expected
* Renaming of member variable (to confirm to style guidelines)
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: I06e11ab2acf5d307b68c3cbc135fde2c038ee690
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/215070
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33721}
* `AddTo` and `Difference` are made into static methods, as one may have
believed that these modified the current object previously. The
`Increment` method is kept, as it's obvious that it modifies the
current object as it doesn't have a return value, and `next_value` is
kept, as its naming (lower-case, snake) indicates that it's a simple
accessor.
* Difference will return the absolute difference. This is actually the
only reasonable choice, as the return value was unsigned and any
negative value would just wrap.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: If14a71636e67fc612d12759dc80a9c2518c85281
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/215069
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33714}
The Reassembly Queue receives fragmented messages (DATA or I-DATA
chunks) and - with help of stream reassemblers - will reassemble these
fragments into messages, which will be delivered to the client.
It also handle partial reliability (FORWARD-TSN) and stream resetting.
To avoid a DoS attack vector, where a sender can send fragments in a way
that the reassembly queue will never succeed to reassemble a message and
use all available memory, the ReassemblyQueue has a maximum size.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: Ibb084fecd240d4c414e096579244f8f5ee46914e
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/214043
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33678}
This class handles the assembly of fragmented received messages (as DATA
chunks) and manage per-stream queues. This class only handles
non-interleaved messages as described in RFC4960, and is not used when
message interleaving is enabled on the association, as described in
RFC8260.
This is also only part of the reassembly - a follow-up change will add
the ReassemblyQueue that handle the other part as well. And an even
further follow-up change will add a "interleaved reassembly stream".
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: Iaf339fa215a2b14926f5cb74f15528392e273f99
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/214042
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33677}
The Data Tracker's purpose is to keep track of all received DATA chunks
and to ACK/NACK that data, by generating SACK chunks reflecting its view
of what has been received and what has been lost.
It also contains logic for _when_ to send the SACKs, as that's different
depending on e.g. packet loss. Generally, SACKs are sent every second
packet on a connection with no packet loss, and can also be sent on a
delayed timer.
In case partial reliability is used, and the transmitter has decided
that some data shouldn't be retransmitted, it will send a FORWARD-TSN
chunk, which this class also handles, by "forgetting" about those
chunks.
Bug: webrtc:12614
Change-Id: Ifafb0c211f6a47872e81830165ab5fc43ee7f366
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/213664
Commit-Queue: Victor Boivie <boivie@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Tommi <tommi@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33676}
