This propagated into various other places. Also had to #include headers that
were implicitly pulled by "scoped_ptr.h".
BUG=webrtc:5520
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1920043002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#12501}
We must remove dependency on Chromium, i.e. we can't use Chromium's base/logging.h. That means we need to define these macros in WebRTC also when doing Chromium builds. And this causes redefinition.
Alternative solutions:
* Check if we already have defined e.g. CHECK, and don't define them in that case. This makes us depend on include order in Chromium, which is not acceptable.
* Don't allow using the macros in WebRTC headers. Error prone since if someone adds it there by mistake it may compile fine, but later break if a header in added or order is changed in Chromium. That will be confusing and hard to enforce.
* Ensure that headers that are included by an embedder don't include our macros. This would require some heavy refactoring to be maintainable and enforcable.
* Changes in Chromium for this is obviously not an option.
BUG=chromium:468375
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1335923002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9964}
Part of work removing dependency on Chromium's base.
Only adds "= delete". From https://codereview.chromium.org/1151443003 :
"This will guarantee the error to be at compile time, and not rely on the call visibility (private)."
In consequence of that change, fixed an illegal copy and removed a bunch of unused variables.
Depends on https://codereview.webrtc.org/1345433002/
BUG=chromium:468375
(in particular comment #37)
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1342543004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9954}
Part of work removing dependency on Chromium's base.
Only adds "= delete". From https://codereview.chromium.org/1151443003 :
"This will guarantee the error to be at compile time, and not rely on the call visibility (private)."
In consequence of that change, fixed an illegal copy and removed a bunch of unused variables.
BUG=chromium:468375 (in particular comment #37)
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1316363005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9913}
Bug 4865: even without STUN/TURN, as long as the peer is on the open internet, the connectivity should work. This is actually a regression even for hangouts.
We need to issue the 0.0.0.0 candidate into Port::candidates_ and filter it out later. The reason is that when we create connection, we need a local candidate to match the remote candidate.
The same connection later will be updated with the prflx local candidate once the STUN ping response is received.
BUG=webrtc:4865
R=juberti@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1274013002 .
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#9708}
UDP case should not be changed.
Active TCPConnection will initiate Reconnect after OnClose and when Send or Ping fails.
Passive TCPConnection will prune itself as usual as the active side will create a new connection.
The Reconnect could make P2PCT choose a different best_connection in the case where connectivities exist b/w more than 1 Network.
Also, to avoid upper layer triggers ice restart, the WRITE_TIMEOUT caused by the socket disconnection is delayed to give the reconnect mechanism chance to kick in. The timeout event is only fired if the reconnect can't work in 5 sec. If the reconnect, there should be no ICE disconnected state trigger either in active or passive side.
BUG=1926
R=pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/31359004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8929}
Mostly this consists of marking functions with override when
applicable, and moving function bodies from .h to .cc files.
Not inlining virtual functions with simple bodies such as
{ return false; }
strikes me as probably losing more in readability than we gain in
binary size and compilation time, but I guess it's just like any other
case where enabling a generally good warning forces us to write
slightly worse code in a couple of places.
BUG=163
R=kjellander@webrtc.org, tommi@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/47429004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8656}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8656 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
VirtualSocketServer, when binding to any address (all 0s), will assign a unique IP address by incrementing the IP address, resulted in 0.0.0.1. However, this breaks the testing of 4276 where we bind to all 0s and expect the local address should remain all 0s.
BUG=4276
R=pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/35189004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8370}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8370 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
Failed on Linux_Memcheck bot.
http://chromegw/i/client.webrtc/builders/Linux%20Memcheck/builds/3182
> VirtualSocketServer out-of-order issue with closing TCP sockets
>
> https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/41449004 added a TURN TCP
> allocation release test which was disabled as it triggered an assert
> in the turnserver.
>
> This was caused by VirtualSockerServer delivering the last TCP packet
> after closing the connection. Calling
> VirtualSocketServer::SendTcp
> and
> VirtualSocket::Close
> from TestTurnTCPReleaseAllocation led to the following order of
> messages in VirtualSocket::OnMessage:
> MSG_ID_DISCONNECT
> MSG_ID_PACKET
>
> This is out of order and triggers an assert in turnserver.cc since the
> socket from which the message arrives has already been discarded,
> subsequently breaking the test.
>
> In VirtualSocketServer::Disconnect the MSG_ID_DISCONNECT is posted to the
> msg_queue immediately, thus getting ahead of any (slightly delayed)
> actual packets.
>
> Maybe PostAt(network_delay_ + 1, ...) would be better?
>
> Re-enables TestTurnTCPReleaseAllocation.
>
> BUG=
> R=juberti@webrtc.org
>
> Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/34759004TBR=pthatcher@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/38979004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8280}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8280 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/41449004 added a TURN TCP
allocation release test which was disabled as it triggered an assert
in the turnserver.
This was caused by VirtualSockerServer delivering the last TCP packet
after closing the connection. Calling
VirtualSocketServer::SendTcp
and
VirtualSocket::Close
from TestTurnTCPReleaseAllocation led to the following order of
messages in VirtualSocket::OnMessage:
MSG_ID_DISCONNECT
MSG_ID_PACKET
This is out of order and triggers an assert in turnserver.cc since the
socket from which the message arrives has already been discarded,
subsequently breaking the test.
In VirtualSocketServer::Disconnect the MSG_ID_DISCONNECT is posted to the
msg_queue immediately, thus getting ahead of any (slightly delayed)
actual packets.
Maybe PostAt(network_delay_ + 1, ...) would be better?
Re-enables TestTurnTCPReleaseAllocation.
BUG=
R=juberti@webrtc.org
Review URL: https://webrtc-codereview.appspot.com/34759004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#8271}
git-svn-id: http://webrtc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8271 4adac7df-926f-26a2-2b94-8c16560cd09d
